Popular Video Clip Freee Download

Comments to “Jim Rogers : Let the Fannie and Freddie go bancrupt”

1. YORDANA Says:
   December 7th, 2008 at 01:42:10 Jim Rogers is right on target. We can't bail out the world! Whats so damn bad about bankruptcy? Let the banks go to Consumer Credit Counseling, work out some payment plans and let them get back on their feet. If the damn banks and mortgage companies would work out something with the customers instead of foreclosing...something is better than nothing...this will work it's way out to where everyone wins. But the bailout only helps the crooks.
2. HESTIA Says:
   December 7th, 2008 at 02:05:09 agreed. withdraw all your money. stock up canned foods, gun, ammo, water, gasoline, etc. for the next 3 years. we will have inflationary depression. just today oct. 12, 2008 report came out that the Fed will print UNLIMITED amount of money to insure all financial institutions. damn. that will kill the dollar. the dollar will be worthless.
3. ARCHARD Says:
   December 7th, 2008 at 02:28:08 The dollar is dead. Bernanke is hyperinflationary idiot.
4. ARNON Says:
   December 7th, 2008 at 02:51:07 i love rogers, he always gets mad at these cnbc cowards because they're smoke screening the biggest crime of the century. someday these ladies will realize their treason and hang themselves. rogers if you read this just call it like it is next time and say the fed and british royalty needs to be arrested, you're understating whats happening.
5. Ngaio Says:
   December 7th, 2008 at 03:14:06 Applied Austrian economics = win.
6. WAKEMAN Says:
   December 7th, 2008 at 03:37:05 Yes indeed communism and capitalism are just words to control people and CCP and USA are run by the same bunch of grubby scum bankers.
7. Braden Says:
   December 7th, 2008 at 04:00:04 Well that's the problem with socialism. It's always changing the little things while destroying the big picture. Sure Jim rogers is biased, he believes free markets are better for people. He isn't just saying this because hes shorted. He's believed in this kind of thing for a long time.
8. Jaelynn Says:
   December 7th, 2008 at 04:23:03 doford, here's where you are misunderstanding me. I have only been addressing what to do in the immediate; that is, pour cash into the market for the sake of preventing a stock market collapse. You went from that issue to long terms solutions. I never said a word about the long term other than it would be worse to wait -- which is supported by the referenced article. One more thing, Jim Rogers has shorted many of these companies; he speaks with a biased tongue. Remember that, ok? Peace.
9. IVANA, Says:
   December 7th, 2008 at 04:46:02 it will be alot worse when these bailouts collapse the dollar completely..
10. STOCKARD Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 05:09:01 yes. socialism seems to work best when the administration is by/among a fairly homogonous population. that way all segments of society identify with each other and exploitation of "others" is reduced. i'm not sure that us prisons are in any way social, since they don't rehabilitate, but rather facilitate worse anti-social behaviour. as far as i can tell the wealthy in the usa are colluding with bureaucracy to destroy the middle class, or rather, have become the bureacracy (gwb) for control.
11. Laec Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 05:32:00 here is what i think of the election watch?v=9AvSQuqQb5c
12. Muire Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 05:54:59 That is an interesting reply. The truth is that that the word communism and capitalism are just words to control people. If communism=socialism then yes the US is more communist. USA incarcerates more of its own citizens, more welfare, and more govt. control. I am not on a political rant..most people here in China are pro socialism so good/bad is really according to your perception but the truth is the truth. I think the forms of govt. are nearly identical. I have been short USD for 4 years.
13. Asia Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 06:17:58 i thought communism meant sharing resources amongst your population. all we americans seem to share is pollution and debt. if there is a profit made in america it's clung to desperately and counted in a closet in the middle of the night.
14. PSAMTIC Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 06:40:57 I read the article but the writer doesn't seem to mention anything about the problem of trying to sustain economic growth by increasing debt. We need to go into a reccession / depression to sort out the debt. Confidence in the market will go sooner or later and all this would have been pointless. They should just increase interest rates and pay the debt off. If not the investors will continue mal-investment and things will get worse.
15. Izaan Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 07:03:56 By the way, one excellent objective article is written by Peter S. Goodman. Look for, "A Bailout Plan, but Will It Work?" This article explains much of what I am trying to say. It is located in the business section of the N Y T imes under analysis, on their web site.
16. MORELEY Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 07:26:55 I have posted several links but this site is not displaying my messages. Let me just say this... go to the N Y T imes and read how many economists, including highly accredited faculty from top universities, are advocating this bailout. This forum limits response lengths, so it is difficult to offer support for my arguments. Maybe this article will enlighten you some. You aren't totally wrong, but you aren't as right as you think. Peace. Out.
17. Oriel Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 07:49:54 The USA is more communist than China. We here in China believe this.
18. Aethelred Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 08:12:53 How am i been short sited? By pushing the debt onto the tax payer we are allowing a failing system (selling of debt) to continue. The longer we move the debt onto other people the larger the debt will become, therefore the longer we wait the worse it will be. I know you think you are solving the problem but you are only making it worse. I would prefer a huge collapse of the market now than a gigantic collapse in 5 years time.
19. URSA Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 08:35:52 The short-term debt incurred is far cheaper than facing the collapse of a major stock-market sector. We're talking a several TRILLION dollar disaster without the bailout. Anyone who advocates for the collapse of a major American market sector as some sort of solution, or "payback" to the Wall St. fat-cats is short-sighted and demonstrates a misunderstanding of national economies and their histories. The taxpayers are going to pay no matter what -- the question is, less now or more later?
20. Barth Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 08:58:51 We shouldn't do anything. Let the rubbish banks collapse. Trying to bail them out will only add to the debt. We're in a no win situation. Bailing them out will only make it worse. This is a no win, win situation. Can you explain to me how moving the debt to tax payers will make anything better? You are simply moving the problem onto someone else, not solving it.
21. Thom Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 09:21:50 Yes, but you aren't addressing the problem immediately. What do you propose be done today versus a year down the road? Do you let the entire infrastructure collapse? Listen, I am not living in a fantasy world. I have studied economics and political science at a university that has been rated in the top 10 world-wide. I have firm history, facts and statistics that back up what I am saying. So I ask again, what do you propose we do today versus one year from now?
22. ANGHARAT Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 09:44:49 You're living in a fantasy world. At some point we are going to have to pay the debt. The longer we wait the worse it will be so we have to stop or mass reduce the cause, which is the selling of debt. The 2nd problem is the banks are too big, if one goes under alot of problems occure. What we can do is split the banks up so if one goes bust it doesn't hurt the economy to much. Bailing out the banks doesn't solve the problem, it reduces the economy and allows banks to continue creating debt
23. Senet Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 10:07:48 Everything you say is true, but take into consideration the counter-factual -- if we didn't bail out these institutions, the repercussions would be much worse. Like you, I am not happy in the least about the bailout. But we must consider what will happen if we didn't bail out these institutions -- meltdown of our economy which would would make the 1929 depression seem like a cakewalk.
24. Gwendolyn Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 10:30:47 We're making it worse by moving the debt around. All the government has done is move the debt to tax payers. This means inflation or tax will go up causing a huge loss on sales. Business will go under and and the people will still loss there jobs. They're moving the problem from bankers to the people. You and I are paying for banks poor investments. Why?
25. Amadi Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 10:53:46 it's funny how he tells them the truth and the reporters keep trying to convince him that the dollar is up and everybody is going to be ok

Leave a Reply